These observations are divided into three parts. Firstly the basic facts. Secondly excerpts from various books which have in them descriptions of the facts. And thirdly a sample of the various constructions which can be adduced from these facts.
| 1. | The Importance of the Pyramid (taken as read). |
| 2. | The Importance of the constellation of Draco. |
| 3. | The Importance of the Great Pyramid in Initiation. |
| 4. | The Importance of Draco in Initiation. |
| 5. | Connecting Thread of the Great Pyramid and the constellation of Draco. |
| 6. | ‘Fire’ associated with Draco. |
| 7. | Fire associated with the Great Pyramid. |
| 3. | (The Mysterious Unknown, Robert Charroux) “In the Harris Magic Papyrus ‘the adept must remain in the casket for three days and three nights irradiated by the higher forces, before he can hope to dissever soul and body.’ ” |
| (An Occult History of the World, Volume One, by J. H. Brennan) “The pyramids were also used as what I can only call religious machines, carefully constructed to aid the development of certain spiritual, psychic and psychological faculties in selected individuals … Blavatsky tells how after a series of tests the initiated adept was plunged into a deep sleep and allowed to remain in this state for three days and three nights, during which his spirit visited several planes and conversed with the intelligences inhabiting them. Throughout this experience his body lay in the sarcophagus in the King’s Chamber. In the early 1930s the English yogi Dr. Paul Brunton decided to spend a night in the King’s Chamber of the Great Pyramid and succeeded in getting the co-operation of the authorities in doing so. During the night he had a visionary experience almost exactly parallel to that of Blavatsky’s adept. He was also told by a communicating intelligence, that in ancient times he would have been lying in a sarcophagus, on a bed of papyrus reeds … the out-of-the-body experience he describes is … extremely arduous, and can in some cases literally involve months or years of training. Through the use of the pyramid, however, it appears that this may be circumvented. Occultists believe separation of mind and body occurred quite automatically through the action of whatever mysterious forces the pyramid controlled.” | |
| 4. | (The Secret Doctrine. Anthropogenesis, by H. P. Blavatsky) “He was the second person of the Trinity, the SON, with the Christian Gnostics called Naasenians, or Serpent Worshippers. His symbol was the constellation of the Dragon … In its most terrestrial meaning, the term Dragon was applied to the Wise Men.” “the hierophants of Egypt, of Babylon, and India styling themselves generally the Sons of the Dragon.” |
| 2 & 6. | (Esoteric Astrology, by Alice A. Bailey) “A hint lies in the fact that the constellation of the Dragon has the same relation to the ONE greater than our Logos as the center at the base of the spine has to a human being. It concerns stimulation, and vitalization with a consequent co-ordination of the manifesting fires.” |
| 7. | (The View Over Atlantis, by John Michell) “There is also a strange light which local Bedouins see at certain seasons hovering over its peak. Some years ago an American, William Groff, together with members of the Institut Egyptien, saw this light which appeared as a flame issuing from the Pyramid, and was unable to find any natural explanation which might account for it.” |
| 5. | (The Secret Doctrine. Anthropogenesis, by H. P. Blavatsky) “the Pyramids are closely connected with the Great Dragon (the constellation).” |
| (The Temple of the Stars, by Brinsley Le Poer Trench) “On two days the Pole Star {α Draconis} would be observable at the bottom of the Great Pyramid’s descending passage.” |
What all this shows basically is that the Great Pyramid at Giza was an accumulator using the constellation Draco, and specifically α Draconis, to separate the two parts of the human in the King’s Chamber (I believe that a statue was used to concentrate and emit whatever was stored in the Pyramid, but as unfortunately I can no longer locate the book in which I read this I have not entered it) to communicate with other entities.
This leaves three variables in the construct to fix in my view:
| A. | Nature of sender/senders & receivers |
| B. | Motives of receivers |
| C. | Nature of message |
(the energy used can safely be called sidereal, and appears to be related to set times).
| A. | The sender could be native or alien, human or non-human, internal or external to the receiver. |
| B. | The receivers down the course of time probably varied in motives. A few simple ones are religious or scientific worship, lust for knowledge, and lust for power. |
| C. | The message could be any number of things from the sublime to the ridiculous. I prefer not to discuss the possibilities as they are endless. |
For myself I see it as a Lovecraftian mystery. It has all the elements. And despite the little bit of bias still clinging to him at times H. P. Lovecraft often wrote what dovetail nicely as the backgrounds to a number of Charles Fort’s odd events. In which case perhaps all the probabilities are true in one way or another.